Monday, April 23, 2012

Saltz plays it Safer


Saltz speaks of change in his article "Reject the Market. Embrace the Market.- Eight young artists whose work the critic believes breathes new liveliness into a frustrating system"


Of all eight artists, none are uninitiated; in fact they are all very much insiders so the "liveliness" Saltz is siting should be likened to the St. Vitus dance. Two are from Canada gallery, one from Mitchell-Innes & Nash, one sanctioned by MoMA PS1 and one from Elizabeth Dee no less. Liz Magic Laser's work is politically heavy and dated and Marie Lorenz's piece was done way back in 2006 (hardly fresh in art world time) Throwing in the older artist Bjarne Melgaard from Olso was a nice touch though but was certainly for effect; as was the tricky splicing of Mike Kelly with Alex Israel. uhg!
What is far more interesting than this depressing attempt at art world resuscitation is Jerry's assessment of art the fairs in which he gave an overview that was essentially the same as Morley Safer's 60 Minute piece on which Saltz unleashed fire and brimstone -Jerry's confessional spirit doesn't make this section any less hypocritical either- He sums it all up in writing of the art fairs: "most of the time I see bad art, or see nothing at all..."

Case closed


















Saltz finally buckles under pressure! Jerry Saltz sends this to me a few minutes ago after a fb friend of mine shared a link to his page:


Jerry Saltz
3 minutes ago
Jerry Saltz
·         The only reason I am blocking you on my FB is NOT for anything you have written about me.All that is great. No problem.
The reason I am blocking you is for a phrase you wrote to me that had a kind of violence to it and that for personal reasons hurt me: "Oh no Jerry. I am as serious as a heart attack!"
Thank you for all of your thought about me and my work.


...For a word man, Mr. sensitive pulls the literal slant on the phrase "serious as a heart attack"?! Citing a "kind of" violence? What a cheap way out. This guy is really something! lol

As I said before, This is not about a well worn cliché - phrase written during a sporty and VERY civil exchange that occurred three weeks ago (as he has commented and liked since) but this is about today's criticism piece of his recent article...It is the straw that broke the camel's back. Saltz is a regulator who does NOT want a level playing field and has clearly shown this by cutting off access to his audience. Watch out for this guy art world!

Thursday, April 12, 2012

When the left hand can't see what the right hand is doing

One of my primary concerns with this Kinkade debate is the intensity in which some of these open-minded artists attack a fellow artist...a recently deceased fellow artist at that. Many of these verbal digs are in bad taste at the very least and are outright hateful on the extreme end of the spectrum; some of which are masked behind clever verbiage or tactical humor but none the less, the message is clear. This over the top discourse is specific to a sanctioned mindset that allows the art world -as the case may be- concessions towards overt aggression aimed at the white Christian conservative male (irregardless of specifics in some cases). It seems that targeting this group is the path of least resistance within our tribe in which base human pack mentality and bigoted aggression is allowed to go unchecked. I may even go so far as to suggest that this overcompensation is in response to the decades of suppression of innate aggressive tendencies (via multiculturalism) in liberal-minded white progressives. In other words, this forced system of tolerance has created and nurtured a backlash in which the white Christian conservative male is the only outlet left for intellectuals to freely express their natural tendencies toward collective aggressive behavior. With this in mind, let's not forget that the enlightened academia in Germany played a big part in helping secure Hitler's reign...hell, even Jung was not immune. Bad history tends to repeat itself when the left hand fails to see what the right hand is doing. but hey, this is all just coffee-house speculation coming from a pseudo social scientist/art critic who doesn't believe in a God...so it should be taken with a grain of salt. 

Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Double dealing


In light of all this Kinkade bashing from the art world, let's talk about contemporary artist Hunt Slonem over at Marlborough
Hunt Slonem, is the secular art world's accepted, approved and very $uccessful master of "worthless schmaltz" or to go further with what critic Jerry Saltz originally wielded at Thomas Kinkade: "Unoriginal rote things done in his perfectly conventional, balanced people-pleasing way... confected conglomerations of things people wanted to think they wanted to think about, democratic paintings whose meanings are hidden from no one, whose appeal is to not to vex or disturb, to produce doubt or newness." Slonem’s work fits this description well; in fact you could apply most of Saltz’s scathing Kinkade article to Hunt’s entire body of work and career.

I challenge any art world critic including the “bullshit detector” Walter Robinson, Charlie Finch, Roberta Smith or that pesky husband of hers to take up the challenge and write (in the negative) about Slonem's sugar-coated paintings that any truthful assessment would render “a cliché that has already been told.” This beloved darling gets a free pass with his "hotel art" it seems. The challenge stands.

I doubt, in fact I guarantee that this challenge will NEVER be taken up by ANY critic of consequence in our very open-ended and open-minded tribe (did I mention that I am not a critic of consequence?...yet). Oh you arrogant, exclusive, crooked, decadent, politically-biased, short-sighted, narrow minded, pack-driven art world...I love you.


Hunt Slonem (born July 18, 1951) Since 1977, Slonem has had over 150 solo exhibitions. Over 75 museums internationally include his work in their collections including the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the Guggenheim Museum, both in New York. Hunt owns several homes including two Plantations in Louisiana and the Cordt Mansion in Hudson, New York, as well as several lofts in New York City.

Monday, April 9, 2012

Darkness Visible

In light of all the recent information surrounding the inner workings of artist Thomas Kinkade, it should by now be apparent that this assumed purveyor of pollyannaish product was not as one dimensional as many critics might have suggested; there was indeed a darker current at work here. On a lighter note, may I dare say that Kinkade’s psychological approach was not unlike the late great Mattise in that the latter painted through a rose colored lens…of course the outcome was vastly different but technique and inventiveness aside; Kinkade was a troubled figure at bottom who decided to shelve all that dreary shit and accentuate the positive, to a fault even; but I do wonder -as have others-  if this darker aura could have somehow seeped into all those delightfully banal paintings. If so, these things are shining examples of the contemporary existential dilemma. Future culture connoisseurs might even go so far as to view the works by Kinkade as postmodern suburban-domestic amulets; doing for the average American middle-class household what protection masks did for ancient tribal communities. Why not?...only time will tell. 

Quick pick # 3: Kinkade was here


So it's hipster-safe to like Bob Ross but not Tom Kinkade...f**king d-bag artists. lol Give it 20 years and your kids will be on the "painter of light" like he was Johnny Cash.


"...All I'm saying is that there are more people in this world that enjoy the simple stuff or even mundane stuff over the complicated stuff when it comes to hanging things on the wall. Contemporary, postmodern, conceptual, relational art is a small, exclusive part of a much bigger world. but you know what, most of us at a base level get what the more complicated stuff is saying as well.

It just seems weird how some artists can align themselves with the "masses" when it comes to things like OWS but then want to be among the 1% when it comes to taste. Kind of like having your cake and eating it too I guess. A very exclusionary and elitist mindset to me it seems. I for one prefer Twinkies over caviar but I am also a big fan of Arte Povera and Barouqe. Different strokes right? Are some of you trying to suggest that you do not partake in anything within the realm of mass culture or even “bad taste”? If so, you are better people than me I guess.

I am not a fan of Kinkade but what do I know? Have fun kids. Happy Easter, if that is your thing."  -anonymous FB post 



This is not about art #4: When All Colors Bleed Into One


Here we go again...In the recent shootings in Tulsa, the press made it a point to paint the suspects as two white men when in fact the primary suspect is of color.This is the same initial slip the media pulled in the Florida shooting. Since when are a Native American (Jake England) and a Half Peruvian/half Jew (George Zimmerman) considered white? Boy, it seems somebody wants to stir up the more traditional race conflict thing real bad!

Sunday, April 8, 2012

Damned if you do...


Yet another tasteless pot-shot aimed at a presumably easy target on this Easter day by way of yet another artist; David Deak writes of the image: "He died for your silly beliefs in talking the talk, but not walking the walk." I ask, does this harsh and quite unfair message apply to the Arab world and their highly funded Muslim religious organizations or the super$ art-world establishment as well...From what I understand, Christian organizations have been pumping mass amounts of cash, time and resources for decades towards this type of thing. "Others" should do as much...disclaimer: (I am a liberal atheist) See the outrageous FB exchange I had with an enlightened artist below:

Selin Sinan Uz 
Bishop Desmond Tutu said: “When the missionaries came to Africa they had the Bible and we had the land. They said, 'Let us pray.' We closed eyes. When we opened them we had the Bible and they had the land.”

Justin Town
for what that land is worth...the presumed ills do not even come close to the massive good

Justin Town
Here is the main organization that is working on this situation. Henry J. Kaiser (the founder) was an American industrialist no less.
http://www.kff.org/about/index2.cfm


Selin Sinan Uz
Of course now one can put a price on value of "GOOD".. However, if one leaves nothing of sorth of good to rub people of their own rights leave them ill at the end? Fixing the ill they created all an illusion of masterminded bullies who hide behind gods good will!!

Justin Town
the rights to what? famine and poverty. Your views are incredibly biased Selin... embarrassingly so.

Selin Sinan Uz 
Who says Africa needed anyone?? they are the strongest species God has created.. but evil of the man weakened them!

Justin Town
move there then

Selin Sinan Uz 
Justin: I am not romanticizing the reality of what western world has done to AFRICA.. You are. I am least bias.. infact you are the one who is!

Selin Sinan Uz 
I brought africa to my own home. Helping the ones who needs me here!

Justin Town
I'll bet you did. Romanticizing! lol, you are indeed twisted.

Justin Town
oh, and what better occasion to bring out the issue of the black on black rapes in the Congo...speaking of the "evil of the man" see NY Times article below:

Justin Town

Justin Town
Selin, bigots as yourself are just too easy

Justin Town
Famine and poverty were inseparable from Africa long before the White-man came along. You silly little girl...farewell

Thursday, April 5, 2012

Quick pick (This too shall pass)



Question: In addition to the Saltz Vulture diatribe...why would Jerry's better half waist a precious NY Times article slot on such an obvious aesthetic lightweight like Morley? Why the superfluous tag-team action in this instance? It seems that there is something just a bit off in all of this...could the Morley farce just be a cheap little symbolic nail in the coffin of a more rigid-style approach to art criticism? One can only speculate

- R.I.P Hilton Kramer

Pearls before Swine



Being an atheist myself does not prevent me from seeing the anti-Christian bias that runs rampant in our beloved art world. At times I have sat back and witnessed this bias play itself out in rhetoric** from artists that has been distasteful at the very least and has bordered on hate speech in its extreme; and somehow this is allowed to go unchecked by our cultural overseers. What we progressives need to remind ourselves of every now and then is that Religion by way of Christianity has played and continues to play a major role in our culture (and not necessarily for the worse) as many detractors would have you believe. So here are just a few examples of heavy hitters who have sincerely channeled the (Western) God quite successfully in their works and have given us some cultural gems: John Milton, Johnny Cash, Dostoyevsky,  Bach, William Blake, Sister Corita, Hermann Hesse, John Coltrane, Arvo Part, Vincent van Gogh, Nikos Kazantzakis, Rouault, Kierkegaard and even the divinely wrought minimalist pieces done by the Shakers. Of course there are the many more who have used Christianity as their springboard*... figures such as Friedrich Nietzsche, Carl Jung, Robert Gober, Andres Serrano, David Wojnarowicz and R.Crumb come to mind, Christ, even the Pixies front-man Frank Black was heavily influenced by the Christian songwriter Larry Norman and as it turns out our own beloved art critic extraordinaire David Hickey graduated from the Texas Christian University back in 61'. With all this being said, I now offer an interesting and unbiased article written for e-flux by my -very secular- good friend and art theorist/ critic/philosopher Boris Groys that touches on the relevance of religion (specifically Western religion) within contemporary Western art...so sit back and enjoy the ride:

 http://www.e-flux.com/journal/the-weak-universalism/

*The reactionary influence that Christianity has had on a vast number of great thinkers and artists must be considered and reckoned with. In other words, the departure from Christianity must be seen as a base or catapult from which an intricate thought process emerges. This departure from the original source has been an impetus for an enormous body of Western works and if absent, the very works in question would not have come into being as they stand.


** One example of this rhetoric is a post on Jerry Saltz's FB page by artist Ashley Bickerton (in regards to the death of Thomas Kinkade):
"While I try to approach the work with equivocation, I cannot help but notice that most of the hundreds of pro Kinkade comments on the Huffpo memorial come from people who are 1. Decidedly Evangelical and/or outspoken in their Christian faith, 2. Have no clear functional command of either grammar or spelling, and 3. Invariably talk about being soothed and calmed by this 'realism'. I am truly shocked by the amount of extraordinarily positive emotions this work has been able to draw out of people. This is the most compelling argument I have seen to date for 2 separate species of Homo Sapiens sharing the planet today."

Two more examples from Jerry Saltz's FB page: 1.Artist 
Lucas Tiberius Sams (in regards to the death of Thomas Kinkade): "Is it a bad thing that hearing he was dead was the best part of my week?" 
2.Artist  Mike Cockrill: "I like wearing my fuzzy slippers when I look at my Thomas Kinkade...and my catalog lingerie. I imagine myself in a little cottage in the woods, electric lights burning phosphorous yellow as the hands of the angels decent upon me and I feel the warm breath of Jesus on my neck....my husband is at the trade show and won't be back for hours. Jesus loves me....I desire Him. I shift to a better position, and await "The Master Touch."

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

"Jerry Saltz, Savvy Critic, Declines Town’s Curatorial Challenge"



The NYC based art critic Jerry Saltz recently mocked, chastised and even challenged Canadian reporter and CBS News correspondent Morley Safer over a segment he did for 60 Minutes in which Safer quite accurately criticized Art Basel Miami Beach. Objective art world insiders (if there are any), would find that the Saltz article was pretentious, rife with double standards and embarrassingly elitist. This attack piece seemed to insinuate between the lines that only the initiated have the authority to gripe about this “endemic stuff we all know about and dislike”.  Ultimately, The challenge to Safer was essentially to curate a public New York show of 25 to 35 contemporary artists of which Mr. Saltz would then review. Saltz offered this challenge to Glenn Beck a while back as well. Of course Mr. Safer respectfully declined the offer to the glee of hundreds of Saltz Facebook followers and what ensued was a continual barrage of mocking insults aimed at Safer from Jerry's camp. A victory for the “art-club” so to speak. Mr. Morley Safer was “Saltzed” good and proper and labeled a coward for not taking the challenge…case closed right? Not so fast! The way I see it is that this whole thing is less about Morley Safer's personal work or his "harmless" criticism piece geared to the uninitiated and more about Jerry choosing an easy target to flex his muscles and piggyback for promo.

 Now, seeing as this was such a lopsided victory I decided to turn the tables and extend to Saltz the same challenge he tossed around twice already. After all, he is a long standing art critic so who would be better suited to pull off a show like this?…it would be big, REAL big! And of course I would review the work and foot the entire bill…this was a serious offer and I was ready and able to make it happen. This challenge was posted to Saltz’s Facebook page…and the wait was on…

As was expected Mr. Saltz declined to step up to the plate and accept my very real curatorial challenge; the very same challenge he used against Safer and Beck. What gives? Well, what gives is that this is yet another example of good old fashioned lip service and double standard from a well-healed bully and I’m willing to bet we will not be hearing any of Saltz’s cronies calling him a coward anytime soon either. What is good for the goose is still, as always not good for the gander. Sad thing is, people won’t be able to glean these tidbits on Vulture.com…or even 60 Minutes for that matter. Nor will you find the full exchange on Saltz’s FB page because as it turns out Jerry thought twice and removed some of the response sections of our showdown from his page the following day. Now why would this proponent of transparency and democracy selectively hide seemingly harmless content from his followers? Your guess is as good as mine...talk about self-editing. But all jokes aside, the implications of this little act are actually quite disturbing; those two little deletes - that in essence admit to the decline of a challenge - speak volumes. If a critic is willing to bury content to save face in this small instance just imagine what that same critic might do within the larger picture...the devil is always in the details.



See the full Town vs Saltz exchange below:

[Jerry Saltz to Morley Safer: Morley, I challenge you to curate a public New York show of 25 to 35 contemporary artists — those who have emerged since, say, 1985 — whose work you really approve of, plus a few examples of your own art. I promise to review it, fair and square. Deal?]

Justin Town- I will take this further by suggesting that Mr. Saltz show some balls and originality (as this is his second identical challenge; the first being made to Glenn Beck a while back) and take up my challenge:
Saltz, I challenge you  to curate a public New York show of 25 to 35 contemporary artists — those who have emerged since, say, 1985 — whose work you really approve of, plus a few examples of your own art. I promise to review it, fair and square. Deal? ...seeing as "we're all doing this filtering together"

Justin Town- … This is less about Morley Safer's personal work and a criticism piece geared to the uninitiated and more about Jerry choosing an easy target to flex his muscles and piggyback for promo. My challenge remains unanswered. I will cover all costs of this proposed show as well...press included. Hear that Mr. Saltz...now kindly put your money where your mouth is (money being time and expertise that is) oh, and don't forget...you must provide some of your work you ex-artist you.
... for the record, I could care less about MS, his work or his criticism outside of this context.

Jerry Saltz
- Justin: Thank you for coming onto my fb to comment about me and my work.
If you want to know what I like read me; read both my books; cull from what I write here and in my columns and my books.
I don't mind if you select 25-35 artists from those. I guess that's my show.

-- Now, which 25-35 artists - emerged since 1985 - would YOU say are very good?
I would love to know.

Justin Town- I don't answer the test questions remember. The ball is in your court here

Justin Town- Lets do this thing Jerry, it's bigger than the both of us...

Justin Town- I know who you have "written" about so to refer me to past books or articles is a bit lame my friend. Let's do the here and now! This is about the challenge that you have extended to two different persons already that I am extending to you and I am as serious as a heart attack...and I think you know it. This will not be whittled down to a facebook Q & A. It's on you... Let's get it on!

[deleted]
 Jerry Saltz- Justin. Thank you.
I guess I don't answer the test questions either.

Justin Town- just what I thought...till next time friendo

[deleted]
 Jerry Saltz- Ditto ...



"Jerry Saltz on Morely Safer's Facile 60 MinutesArt-World Screed" Vulture article: http://www.vulture.com/2012/04/jerry-saltz-on-morley-safer-60-minutes-art-world.html
"Morley Safer, Sunday Painter, Declines Saltz's Curatorial Challenge" GalleristNY article: http://www.galleristny.com/2012/04/safer-declines-curatorial-challenge/